Scroll Top

Troposphere

GPS Constellation

Troposphere Committee

Established: 1998

Chair: Sharyl Byram

Data: IGS Troposphere Committee Data

Mailing List: IGS Troposphere Committee Mailing List

The goal of the IGS Troposphere WG is to improve the accuracy and usability of GNSS-derived troposphere estimates. The members and chair produce IGS final troposphere estimates for nearly all the stations of the IGS network, and coordinate WG projects/IGS Workshop technical sessions in support of the WG goals. Visit the Atmospheric Parameters section of the IGS products webpage to learn more about the availability and accuracy of the IGS Final Troposphere Estimates, which can be downloaded using the data link below. Contact this group for more information about the estimates and/or working group activities.

Charter

Introduction

GNSS can make important contributions to meteorology, climatology and other environmental disciplines through its ability to estimate troposphere parameters. Along with the continued contributions made by the collection and analysis of ground-based receiver measurements, the past decade has also seen new contributions made by space-based GNSS receivers, e.g., those on the COSMIC/FORMOSAT mission [1]. The IGS therefore continues to sanction the existence of a Troposphere Working Group (TWG).

 

Working Group Goals

The primary goals of the IGS TWG are to:

  • Assess/improve the accuracy/precision of IGS GNSS-based troposphere estimates.
  • Improve the usability of IGS troposphere estimates.
  • Confer with outside agencies interested in the use of IGS products.
  • Assess which new estimates should be added as “official” IGS products, and which, if any, official troposphere product sets should be discontinued.
  • Provide and maintain expertise in troposphere-estimate techniques, issues and applications.

 

Science Background

The primary troposphere products generated from ground-based GNSS data are estimates of total zenith path delay and north/east troposphere gradient. Ancillary measurements of surface pressure and temperature allow the extraction of precipitable water vapor from the total zenith path delay.

Water vapor, a key element in the hydrological cycle, is an important atmosphere greenhouse gas. Monitoring long-term changes in its content and distribution is essential for studying climate change. The inhomogeneous and highly variable distribution of the atmospheric water vapor also makes it a key input to weather forecasting.

Water vapor distribution is incompletely observed by conventional systems such as radiosondes and remote sensing. However, ground- and space-based GNSS techniques provide complementary coverage of this quantity. Ground-based GNSS observations produce continuous estimates of vertically integrated water vapor content with high temporal resolution over a global distribution of land-based locations; coverage is limited over the oceans (where there is no land). Conversely, water vapor can be estimated from space-borne GNSS receivers using ray tracing techniques, in which case solutions with high vertical resolution (laterally integrated over few hundred kilometers) and good oceanic/land coverage are obtained; these solutions however are discontinuous in geographic location and time.

Be it resolved that the IGS troposphere WG will:

  • Support those IGS analysis centers providing official IGS troposphere products.
  • Increase awareness/usage of IGS troposphere products by members of the atmospheric,meteorology and climate-change communities. Solicit the input and involvement of such agencies.
  • Create new IGS troposphere products as needed (as determined by consultation with the potential user community).
  • Determine the uncertainty of IGS troposphere estimates through comparison of solutions with those obtained from independent techniques, or through other means as appropriate.
  • Promote synergy between space-based and ground-based GNSS techniques through interaction with researchers in both fields.

 

References

[1] Schreiner, W., C. Rocken, S. Sokolovskiy, S. Syndergaard and D. Hunt, Estimates of the precision of GPS radio occultations from the COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 mission, GRL 34, L04808, doi:10.1029/2006GL027557, 2007.

[2] Teke, K., J. Böhm, T. Nilsson, H. Schuh, P. Steigenberger, R. Dach, R. Heinkelmann, P. Willis, R. Haas, S. García-Espada, T. Hobiger, R. Ichikawa and S. Shimizu, Multi-technique comparison of troposphere zenith delays and gradients during CONT08, J Geod 85:395–413, DOI 10.1007/s00190-010- 0434-y, 2011.

Members

 

Last Name First Name Institution Country/Region
Ahmed Furqan Universite du Luxembourg Luxembourg
Amirkhani Mohammad Islamic Azad Univ. Tehran Iran
Bar-Sever Yoaz JPL USA
Bevis Mike OSU USA
Bock Olivier IGN-LAREG France
Boehm Johannes TU Wien Austria
Bosser Pierre ENSG/DPTS France
Bosy Jaroslaw Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics; Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences Poland
Braun John UCAR USA
Byram Sharyl USNO USA
Byun Sung JPL USA
Calori Andrea Univ. Roma “La Sapienza” Italy
Cao Wei Trimble Terrasat Germany
Chen Junping Shanghai Astronomical Observatory China
Colosimo Gabriele Univ. Roma “La Sapienza” Italy
Crespi Mattia Univ. Roma “La Sapienza” Italy
Deng Zhiguo GFZ Germany
Dick Galina GFZ Germany
Dousa Jan GOP Poland
Drummond Paul Trimble USA
Ghoddousi-Fard Reza Natural Resources Canada Canada
Guerova Guergana Univ. Sofia Bulgaria
Gustavson Terry ? USA?
Gutman Seth NOAA USA
Hackman Christine USNO USA
Heinkelmann Robert GFZ Germany
Herring Tom MIT USA
Hilla Steve NGS/NOAA USA
Hobiger Thomas Onsala Space Observatory; Chalmers Univ. of Technology Sweden
Januth Timon Univ. of Applied Sciences, Western Switzerland (?) Switzerland
Jones Jonathan Met Office UK UK
Langley Richard Univ. New Brunswick Canada
Leandro Rodrigo Hemisphere GNSS USA
Leighton Jon 3vGeomatics Canada/UK
Liu George Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hong Kong
Melachroinos Stavros Geoscience Australia (?) Australia
Moeller Gregor TU Wien Austria
Moore Angelyn JPL USA
Negusini Monia Inst. Radioastronomy (IRA); National Inst. Astrophysics (INAF) Italy
Nikolaidou Thaleia Univ. New Brunswick Canada
Nordman Maaria Finnish Geodetic Inst. Finland
Pacione Rosa ASI/CGS Italy
Palamartchouk Kirill Univ. Newcastle UK
Penna Nigel Univ. Newcastle UK
Perosanz Felix CNES France
Pottiaux Eric Royal Obs Belgium Belgium
Prikryl Paul Communications Research Centre, Canada Canada
Realini Eugenio GReD – Geomatics Research & Development s.r.l. Italy
Rocken Chris GPS Solutions USA
Roggenbuck Ole BKG Germany
Rohm Witold Univ. Wroclaw Poland
Romero Ignacio CSC (@ESA/ESOC) Germany
Santos Marcelo Univ. New Brunswick Canada
Schaer Stefan AIUB Switzerland
Schoen Steffen Inst. Erdmessung, Leibniz Uni Hannover Germany
Selle Christina JPL USA
Sguerso Domenico Lab. Geodesy, Geomatics, GIS; Univ. Genoa Italy
Soudarin Laurent Collecte Localisation Satellites France
Teferle Norman Universite du Luxembourg Luxembourg
Tracey Jeffrey USNO USA
van der Marel Hans TU Delft Netherlands
Waithaka Edward Hunja Jomo Kenyatta U. of Agriculture and Technology Kenya
Wang Junhong UCAR/NCAR USA
Willis Pascal Inst. de Physique du Globe de Paris France
Xu Zong-qiu Liaoning TU China
Zhang Shoujian Wuhan Univ. China

Formats

 

Tropo SINEX v2.00 Solution (Software/Technique) Independent Exchange (SINEX) format for TROpospheric and meteorological parameters
Tropo SINEX Zenith path delay products

Data

Visit the CDDIS Archive Access page to view current troposphere solution files.

 

Data Details

 

ATMOSPHERIC PARAMETERS

Type Accuracy Latency Updates Sample Interval
Final tropospheric zenith path delay with N, E gradients 4 mm (ZPD) < 4 weeks daily 5 minutes
Final ionospheric TEC grid 2-8 TECU ~11 days weekly 2 hours;
5 deg (lon) x 2.5 deg (lat)
Rapid ionospheric TEC grid 2-9 TECU <24 hours daily 2 hours;
5 deg (lon) x 2.5 deg (lat)

 

IGS Final products (IGS)

The IGS Final products have the highest quality and internal consistency of all IGS products. They are made available on a weekly basis, by each Friday, with a delay up to 13 (for the last day of the week) to 20 (for the first day of the week) days. The exception is the IGS Final Troposphere Estimates, which are produced approximately 1-7 days after the IGS Final Orbits, Clocks and Earth Rotation Parameters have been computed. The IGS Final products are the basis for the IGS reference frame and are intended for those applications demanding high consistency and quality.

 

IGS Rapid products (IGR)

The IGS Rapid products have a quality nearly comparable to that of the Final products. They are made available on a daily basis with a delay of about 17 hours after the end of the previous observation day; i.e., the IGS Rapid products are released daily at about 17:00 UTC. For most applications the user of IGS products will not notice any significant differences between results obtained using the IGS Final and the IGS Rapid products.

 

IGS Ultra-rapid products (IGU)

To reduce the age of the prior, discontinued Predicted orbits, the IGS started the Ultra-rapid products officially week 1087 in November 2000 (see IGSMAIL-3088) . Like the former IGS Predicted products, the Ultra-rapid products are available for real time and near real time use. The Ultra-rapid products are released four times per day, at 03:00, 09:00, 15:00, and 21:00 UTC. (Until week 1267 they were released twice daily.) In this way the average age of the predictions is reduced to 6 hours (compared to 36 hours for the old IGS Predicted products and 9 hours for the twice-daily Ultra-rapids). The shorter latency should lead to significantly improved orbit predictions and reduced errors for user applications. Contrary to all other IGS orbit products the IGS Ultra-rapid orbit files contain 48 hours of tabulated orbital ephemerides, and the start/stop epochs continuously shift by 6 hours with each update. All other orbit products contain strictly the 24 hours from 00:00 to 23:45. The first 24 hours of each IGS Ultra-rapid orbit are based on the most recent GPS observational data from the IGS hourly tracking network. At the time of release, the observed orbits have an initial latency of 3 hours. The next 24 hours of each file are predicted orbits, extrapolated from the observed orbits. The orbits within each Ultra-rapid product file are, however, continuous at the boundary between the observed and predicted parts. Normally, the predicted orbits between 3 and 9 hours into the second half of each Ultra-rapid orbit file are most relevant for true real time applications.

Last Updated on 6 Feb 2024 17:30 UTC

Privacy Preferences
When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in form of cookies. Here you can change your privacy preferences. Please note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we offer.